Question:
Which surgery did you choose and why?

This is going to look like ALOT of ???, but I am just really curious so I would just like to take a survey to find out: Which surgery did you have done? What are the reasons that you chose this type? What kind of results have you had? Did you have any complications? Have you ever wished you had a different surgery and which? Long Term Post-Ops, have you gained any back? Have you ever been sorry that you had WLS?    — DELINDA T. (posted on October 3, 2002)


October 3, 2002
I selected the RNY LAP because its the gold standard of bariatic surgery and endorsed by the NIH. Attending support group meetings I saw first hand the happy post ops and decided I wanted to be one of them. I selected LAP because 30% of opens get herias and I didnt want a follow up surgery. My surgery was July 23 2001. I lost 130 pounds and am maintaing well. My profile badly needs updated. I help out here moderating and my life is so busy. My ONLY regret is not having surgery sooner! My only complication was some slow healing port sites. My wife had the surgery too december 10th 2001 and lost 100 pounds as of yesterday. She has had dehydration early on and may have a ulcer, But her asthma is GONE! Surgery saved BOTH our lives... I can work for you too!
   — bob-haller

October 3, 2002
I had no choice. My doctor chose Open RNY because of the thickness of my belly. He does lap whenever possible, but if he can't reach well, he has to do open. Pam German- 12 days post
   — Pam G.

October 3, 2002
hi there, i had open rny on feb 8 02 im down nearly 150 lbs now. there were no complications at all. im very greatful. this is the one i did the most research on and after reading all of it and reading carnie wilsons book this is the one i wanted. i had bcbs of illinois and the surgeon i was referred to only did this one anyway. he only did it open. i had also read that the rny was the most successful one. i have only one conern and that is i am not transected. im just stapled. transection is when they cut the old tummy and new pouch apart where the other way you are just stapled to divide the two. i worry about staple line disruption someday. maybe ill be ok and it will never happen. there are pros and cons to both. if you are transected and you leak, its usually very early post op but if not caught is usually fatal. if you arent transected, if you have a leak its not fatal but you would be able to eat more ultimatly gaining the weight back. im not sure if im rny proximal or rny distall. i think im distall though because i started at 5 9 370 and i read some of the other patients my surgeon had were all distall so hopefully im distall. proximal is usually done on the lighter weights i think. best of luck to you and hope this helps :)
   — carrie M.

October 3, 2002
At the time of my surgery (1994), my choices were VBG or (very) distal RNY, both open. Of those 2 choices, what I saw were these: VBG's vomited daily and were still roundy; DRNY were at goal wt and didn't vomit (except when stupid). That's what I saw, no offense to VBG's. I will be 8 yrs tomorrow, still under 115# (150 lost), but I rarely weigh. I had marginal ulcers, BUT pre-op I had regular ulcers, so that's a wash. No, never wished I'd had another surgery. I had to have a repair (old suagry, old style, not transected, so I had staple line disruption), so I got to choose again in 2000. Same doc, just the repair, no change to my surgery type. I have had NO regrets. I may resent the disease (morbid obesity) and wish I didn't have to choose to live with the disease OR to live with the treatment, BUT since I do have the disease, I am glad I chose this particular treatment. My disease remains in remission as I write.
   — vitalady

October 3, 2002
I chose the lap band (adjustable gastric band) over the other surgeries. I'm very happy with my choice. Here's why I chose it: 1) it is a safer surgery with less mortality (6 out of 90,000 compared to one in 200 for other surgeries) 2) it's less invasive-no internal organs are cut or rearranged and many docs are doing it outpatient now 3) it's reversible with the result being a basically normal digestive system 4) it's adjustable. as weight loss slows (as it does with all surgeries) i can get a fill and weight loss continues. there is no "window of opportunity" as with most other surgeries. 5) no malabsorption. all my vitamins and minerals get absorbed so massive supplementation is not required 6) no dumping. i can't eat almost anything-just smaller amounts 7) i want to get pregnant in the future and in that case the band can be emptied of any fill and the nutrition and eating patterns during the pregnancy will be normal 8) weight loss is slower, but steady. it's not as much of a shock to the body. 9) easier to keep a secret because of #8 10) the WLS of choice in Australia and Europe. the other surgeries are almost unheard of over there because they are considered too dangerous 11) i personally could not imagine cutting up any of my internal organs and sewing them back together. i also could not tolerate the high chance of mortality from the surgery itself.
   — M. B.

October 3, 2002
I had LAP RNY. I choose this surgery because, after months of research, it was considered the most successful of all the surgeries. I have had great results, had surgery Jan. 9th, 2002 and have lost 97 pounds with 23 to goal. I haven't had any problems with throwing up or dumping. I DID have complications though.......pneumonia and fluid (puss) between my lung and diaphragm. Do I regret this surgery, NO WAY!! I can honestly say that for the first 4 or 5 months I DID regret it because it took me quite a long time to feel good and I didn't like ANY kind of food. It was pretty tough. BUT, I would do it again in a heartbeat!!
   — Kim B.

October 3, 2002
I chose Open RNY. Ok I didnt chose the open part the surgeon did. I couldnt have had lap even if I was scheduled for it due to a super fatty liver. (sounds yummy dont it) I decided on RNY mostly because of sucess rate and the food restriction. I dont dump on sweet things but if I eat too much (example a small piece of german chocolate cake) its like I am drunk and need to pass out. So I guess that is a form of dumping but not the typical form. I had my surgery 4 monhs ago and went from 304 to 210. I am so close to the century club I can TASTE it!!! I think the type of surgery U chose to have is such a personal decission. I know I needed to go for the gusto and get the most for my mile. So RNY it was. I think the sucess of the surgery depends alot on the person and the commitment as well as the TYPE of surgery. PS with my open I do have a hernia. I just figure it will make my tt easier to be approved. :0) Best of Luck!
   — Sassy M.

October 3, 2002
My inital choice was the gastric bypass itself. My doctor made the choice of lap or open. She will always start of lap but if she can't proceed she will switch to open. She always warns you of this. Its like driving through traffic and you have to make important choices as you go. If its sunny surgery can be a breeze. If its raining she takes her time and make sure she has your best interest first. I had my surgery March 22, 2002. I am down from 260 to 178 and my 20 lbs from my goal and 30 from the doctors. The doctor is very please at my pleasant weight and frankly so am i. I chose to have the surgery because nothing else was working and although I did not have major co morbid I did have severe ankle pain, swelling, back aches, snoring, heavy breathing, reflex, and depression. I did not have any complication that wasn't brought on by ME. So please follow doctors orders. They can be strict but its for your own good. I would do this again in an heartbeat. Good Luck and GoD Bless.
   — Chris9672

October 4, 2002
I had open RNY. I chose Roux-en-Y because I wanted the benefits of dumping if I ate too much sugar or fats and I wanted the malabsorption of calories. I had my surgery 10 months ago and have lost 150+ pounds; I still have about 40 or 50 to go to be "normal". The only complication I had was a slight blockage in the pouch which was fixed with an endoscopy (no big deal)and no, I have not wished that I had chosen a different surgery. As far as being sorry that I had the surgery - no way. This is definitely the best thing I have ever done for myself.
   — Patty_Butler

October 4, 2002
I chose the lap RNY. RNY because its the gold standard with the highest rate of success, and because I welcomed the dumping syndrome, having been totally addicted to sugar and fats pre-op. I wanted lap because I had had a previous lap surgery and was amazed at how quickly you recover from lap vs. open and I like the little teeny scars. Results: 8 months post-op, down 82 pounds and 20-25 away from goal. I did have a complication-5 days after initial surgery, my small bowel was kinked and sucked into a hernia that we didn't know I had until after the doc had opened me up the first time. He thought the hernia would be OK until I returned for a tummy tuck (good way to get insurance to approve) but guess it couldn't wait. So despite wanting the lap, I had an emergency open surgery 5 days after the lap RNY. I have not wished I had a different surgery, tho the lap band intrigues me. But I have heard good and bad about the lap band, and I think the malabsorbtion/dumping of RNY is a good thing for me and I wouldn't have that with the lap band. And finally, I am very glad I had WLS. It has given me a second chance at life, returned my self-esteem, returned my happiness to me, and literally saved my marriage.
   — Cindy R.

October 4, 2002
I had lap RNY distal on May 9th of this year. I chose lap because it would be less scariing a a quicker recovery time. I was shopping at the mall 5 days post op and back to work within 14 days. The results have been I lost 92 pounds in 4 1/2 months. I have gone from a size 24 to a size 8. My only regret is that I thought about the surgery for a year before I actually did it. This was the best thing I have ever done. Check out my profile. Before my surgery I was worried about how could a person be happy after the surgery. I am happier than I have been since I was a teenager. I eat anything I want, I just get filled up really easy now. You know how you feel after eating Thankgiving dinner? That overstuffed feeling like you can't put another bite in your mouth. I just get that feeling now after a smaller amount. Like one pork chop and a baked potato instead of three pork chops and a pile of potatoes, cake, bread and everything else. I have had no complications and I don't have any hanging skin. I have been extra careful to get in all of my protein everyday as well as my vitamins. I also have all of my hair. People say I look like a teenage and I feel like one too! I even got cardee last week. Trust me that is a good feeling when you are married with four kids in your thirties. Please feel free to email me with any questions you may have. The one piece of advice I would give is research your surgeon. Find out what his success rates have been what complications his patients have had. How many surgeries has he performed. Interview him. Every surgeon is different and like any other job some are better at their job than others.
   — Linda A.

October 4, 2002
I had an Open RNY on 02/14/02. I chose the RNY for the same reason as others; it is widely acknowledged as the highest standard of WLS. I also was attracted by the restrictive/malabsorptive combo. I do not dump, although I choose not to eat sweets so maybe I would if I did. I chose Open vs. Lap becasue I didn't want to be under anesthesia that long, and I had the most confidence in my very excellent surgeon that he was more competent performing it Open (which is very important). Despite being open, I have a tidy, thin 3 inch scar. I am 7 1/2 months post-op and down 127.5lbs from my start weight of 314. I would like to lose about 27 more pounds, but would be content if I didn't lose another. I feel fabulous and can't imagine how I lived life for so long before surgery. I wouldn't give my Weight Loss back for a million dollars. No complications, no regrets. Now if I could only get my boobs back to where they used to be. ;)
   — PaulaM

October 4, 2002
I am an academic researcher by trade. I was delayed (I believe by divine intervention) in scheduling my RnY WLS surgery for over 2 months because of high blood pressure and a sinus infection. Therefore, I had time to do a lot of research (I did this research in four languages, and I was open-minded about all that I read). I was especially interested in learning the difference between RnY and the BPD/DS (Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch). I learned that, what I came to believe are unreasonable despite myths to the contrary, I found that the BPD/DS is a superior operation to the RnY because it allows patients to lead a normal life with near-normal dietary habits and sustained-weight-loss long after surgery. The hallmark of BPD/DS is the preservation of the pyloric valve which is at the last portion of the stomach and acts as a gateway to the small bowel. In both surgeries the colon is bypassed, cut approximately in half and brought up to the stomach. However, in the RnY the surgeon restricts the new stomach pouch to one ounce, and then he/she also creates a very small artificial opening in the stomach to attach the "plumbing" to the lower colon "common channel". In the BPD/DS the surgeon maintains more of the original stomach (a 6-8 ounce stomach pouch is created), and an artificial opening does not need to be made. Thus in this second procedure there is little or no "dumping syndrome" nor restriction of food intake like there is in RnY. My summation? The BPD/DS has the advantages of 1) almost complete lack of "dumping"'; 2) no across-the board food restrictions; 3) much lower incidence of weight regain (research shows 30% regain in RnY), 4) almost no incidence of ulcers but in RnY it is 12-16%--quite often happening at seven year post-op period; 5) and finally the pyloric valve enables the body to absorb much more of the needed nutritents such as calcium and iron.
   — [Deactivated Member]

October 4, 2002
I chose the DS because of the nutritional freedom and also because my Doctor was highly experienced with this surgery and with doing it lap. I had regrets every day for the first 4 weeks and I think that's pretty standard, I haven't looked back since. With my surgery I'm surprised at the amount and variety of food I can eat, I feel 100% normal. I have one small hernia that will be repaired with a small TT when I reach my goal, I didn't loose any hair and I don't have much hanging skin, I'm actually pretty body proud these days, even naked.LOL.. I've lost 101 lbs in 7 months & 1 week...I feel wonderful, I want to loose 35 more and with the DS we have an 18 months loosing window, so I'm not too worried. LIFE IS GOOD!
   — Diane B.

October 4, 2002
I had the DS. I chose this surgery for a couple of reasons. One I wanted to keep my pyloric valve that emptys the stomach into the intestants. If you lose your pyloris you dump, I didn't want to dump. Another reason, was I wanted to be able to eat socialy and now one would know I had surgery. My origional post op stomach was 6 oz it bigger now. I can eat that a normal thin wonan would eat. I don't have to pulverize my food, I don't have to eat really slow. I have never thrown up. Lastly, in doing my extensive research I fould that the DS has the best long term sucess. I am 13 months post op and down 125 lbs. I still have 40 more till goal, but atleast 20 if that is loose skin!!!! I have no direha, only loose stools some times depending on what I eat. I don't have excessive gas nor do I have bo or bad breath (unless you chatch me in the morning before I brush ha ha). Those are myths. At the time of my surgery I has complications I have endometrosis and that made my spleen adhere to my stomach so I lost a lot of blood because of the spleen. Than I was immoble whith low blood counts and devloped pnumonia. I was in the hospital 1 week and after that I have had no problems. I would do this surgery again at the drop of a hat. I am so happy I picked the DS I have heard so many storie about people with the RNY wishing thay had the DS. They had complications with staple line disruptions, stomas closing or streaching. The worst to me would be margional ulcers. They are really painful I hear. The DS has non of those problems. I wish you the best of luck with your surgery which ever you choose, but here is a great link about the DS www.duodenalswitch.com and www.mywls.com These 2 sites saved my life!!!!!!!!!
   — Jody Diou




Click Here to Return
×